I know I used the word 'think', but I'm referring to information like you'll find in
this post (I know it's later than my post, but the info is relevant).
If our diesel's cetane rating is lower, and the addition of the 2-stroke improves the combustion performance, I don't see a problem. That the improvement isn't huge shouldn't make too much difference - it's like the difference between 91 and 93 octane unleaded.
Besides, and this is the thing I don't get at all - this entire thread is about using 2-stroke oil in diesel fuel. The thread has become a stomping ground for some to just sit back - never having tried it - and without any actual experience of adding it to their fuel, and run circular arguments about how the stuff won't ever be used in their engines and we're retards for even trying.
Well, this retard DID try it, because THIS retard won't shoot his mouth off without trying something and then boast all over the thread that it's this way or that way. So, THIS retard HAS some experience with it and has found NO negative effects.
i tried it only once so far, I did notice that engine seemed much quieter at cold start and also a bit more zippy of mark, it could be my imagination so ill try over a couple of tanks of juice to see how it goes. Please excuse my shelterd life but what is a (DPF) and im with tony if ya havnt tried ya cant know
The only reason an oil company is going to jump on the 2-stroke bandwagon is if they can make even more money out of it. To do that, they have to have both a product AND a market willing to buy the product. Because there isn't a majority of diesel owners that want to use it, they might have a product but they have no market.
The
government can force the market (look at unleaded) but there's nothing in the 2-stroke debate that would justify such a move by the government. Remember that lead is a poison, it's dangerous, and so the government looks good for removing it from the fuel. The addition of 2-stroke to diesel doesn't save lots of babies from popping out as walking pumpkins with 2 legs, 3 eyes and a tail, so there's no motivation for the government to act at all - so this won't be forced on the market.
And so, the oil companies have NO reason to move on this at all.
It's just a few of us who have tried it, and seen that there are some positive results. I tried it - and I've got a DPF, so I had a LOT more to lose than others (the $4,000 DPF being the first thing!) and I've had NO negative effects.
If I did have any negative effects that were the result of the 2-stroke, you can bet everything you own that I'd be in this thread in a flash to warn people about it so that they don't make the same mistake.
However, I tried it, it worked, I had NO problems at all with it and I'm happy enough to do it again (if and when I can get motivated enough to pull the oil container out and pour it into my tank - as I said before, MY problem is lethargy!).
The argument of "I am NOT going to try it, so if YOU try it, then you are a retard" doesn't wash well. Imagine how you'd feel right now if the clever bastard that invented bubbles in beer was put off doing it by someone calling him a retard for trying.