Just interested in a discussion...
What are peoples thoughts on "cheap copy" accessories? Without going into discussion about "I can't afford to buy ARB/TJM etc", do people believe we should buy cheap copies of "branded" products? And if so, where do we draw the line? each of us expects our intellectual property would be respected, that someone doesn't just blatantly rip off our products, so is this any different?
My reason for asking is that I get a little peeved when we have companies putting lots of research $ into developing good products, then they are shipped off overseas for copying, and produced by a myriad of different companies in a myriad of different factories, and brought in by Company X and sold at a much cheaper price than the original. The overseas rip offs haven't had to pay for the R&D, so why should they benefit from the design of the original?
I'll pick ARB because they are an easy target. Their gear costs a fair bit. But there are plenty of companies out there selling gear which "looks just like ARB stuff" for a fraction of the price. There are plenty of examples - bullbars, roof racks... There are LOTS of companies doing blatant rip-offs of the ARB designs, and selling a motza.
So what are your thoughts? Should we support the company that puts the money into R&D and keeps coming up with the new products, or should we support the companies which peddle the copies and really couldn't care less whether the market is going to be around next year?
I'll air my opinion up front - basically, I reckon if we don't buy original and reject the copies, then companies which actually DO the R&D and come up with the original products will stop doing so and find something else to do with their money.
Will be interested to see the responses.
What are peoples thoughts on "cheap copy" accessories? Without going into discussion about "I can't afford to buy ARB/TJM etc", do people believe we should buy cheap copies of "branded" products? And if so, where do we draw the line? each of us expects our intellectual property would be respected, that someone doesn't just blatantly rip off our products, so is this any different?
My reason for asking is that I get a little peeved when we have companies putting lots of research $ into developing good products, then they are shipped off overseas for copying, and produced by a myriad of different companies in a myriad of different factories, and brought in by Company X and sold at a much cheaper price than the original. The overseas rip offs haven't had to pay for the R&D, so why should they benefit from the design of the original?
I'll pick ARB because they are an easy target. Their gear costs a fair bit. But there are plenty of companies out there selling gear which "looks just like ARB stuff" for a fraction of the price. There are plenty of examples - bullbars, roof racks... There are LOTS of companies doing blatant rip-offs of the ARB designs, and selling a motza.
So what are your thoughts? Should we support the company that puts the money into R&D and keeps coming up with the new products, or should we support the companies which peddle the copies and really couldn't care less whether the market is going to be around next year?
I'll air my opinion up front - basically, I reckon if we don't buy original and reject the copies, then companies which actually DO the R&D and come up with the original products will stop doing so and find something else to do with their money.
Will be interested to see the responses.