Attaching plastic to that car is precisely what should have been done, the owner just screwed up what KIND of plastic.
Someone write to the poor guy and tell him it's spelt "C4".
Help Support Nissan Navara Forum:
Attaching plastic to that car is precisely what should have been done, the owner just screwed up what KIND of plastic.
Someone write to the poor guy and tell him it's spelt "C4".
kevinm1962
Member
has anyone else sent him a message i just had to. sure as turds are brown ive had a good laugh thanks guys.kev
pattyp88
Member
Hahahahaha Thankyou so much this made my year . Dam things are the modern day jumbuck haha
NathanJG
Member
just saw a great wall in Bundaberg with twin stacks sticking out of the tub. Some people have no sense.
BP90
Member
Far out aye... Someone should stop this person breeding.
Nissan Nut
Member
Man i'd love to see that go over some rough Terrain.. I'd pay to see that!! 
D
Dave
Guest
They do. But brake tests can sometimes be taking the machine out back and doing the test in the office. Seen it before. Dodgy as.
K
KraftyPg
Guest
I got an 'official RTA' brake test on an 86 Corolla done in Seven Hills back in 2000 by having the mechanic drop the brake test unit on the bench. His comment was "as long as it doesn't get a perfect result they'll never query it."
Nothing dodgy about that
Nothing dodgy about that
D
Dave
Guest
Seen that too. Haha.
People will always get around the system.
People will always get around the system.
K
KraftyPg
Guest
I also had the horned hooked up to a switch under the dash because I couldn't be stuffed fixing the steering wheel switch. Wired it straight through the switch to the battery and the wire fell off the battery on the trip over to the testing place. The guy held the wire on the battery, agreed the horn worked and ticked it off. Damn I'm glad that wasn't my car.
D
Dave
Guest
That industry needs too be cleaned up.
But nope, speeding tickets bring in more revenue.
But nope, speeding tickets bring in more revenue.
K
KraftyPg
Guest
**** the speeders, double the fines I say and triple the number of cameras and cops issuing them. But yeah that industry does need cleaning up. I think the idea behind yearly roadworthies is good but the practice leads to too much corruption and bullshit.
We obviously have dodgy roadworthy guys in Vic and we also have plenty of unroadworthy cars, but forcing people to get their cars roadworthied every 12 months has ensured that there is a bunch of corrupt testers willing to pass shit for an extra dollar because money talks and takes away the effectiveness of actually getting those checks done. it also just makes those doing it honestly feel ripped off.
We obviously have dodgy roadworthy guys in Vic and we also have plenty of unroadworthy cars, but forcing people to get their cars roadworthied every 12 months has ensured that there is a bunch of corrupt testers willing to pass shit for an extra dollar because money talks and takes away the effectiveness of actually getting those checks done. it also just makes those doing it honestly feel ripped off.
D
Dave
Guest
A roadworthy car at 10km's above the speed limit is way safer then a car with dodgy brakes, shock absorbers that are rooted etc.
Every car on the road should be tested yearly. Despite age, I have seen some vehicles less then a year old is very poor condition.
Car's keep getting safer and safer. The current speed limits were designed for cars like the XR Falcon, EH Holden (4 wheel drum brakes, no brake booster, old school designed shock absorbers, old school suspension designs etc.)
Every car on the road should be tested yearly. Despite age, I have seen some vehicles less then a year old is very poor condition.
Car's keep getting safer and safer. The current speed limits were designed for cars like the XR Falcon, EH Holden (4 wheel drum brakes, no brake booster, old school designed shock absorbers, old school suspension designs etc.)
K
KraftyPg
Guest
Speed limit is a speed limit, the arguments that they were made for old cars or old roads is bullshit and I'm yet to see proof of such an argument.
If they want to make yearly roadworthies they should make them free. While I agree that there are some shitboxes on the road that should be removed yearly roadworthies will only be widely accepted if they remove the cost aspect and make it about safety and not about money.
If they want to make yearly roadworthies they should make them free. While I agree that there are some shitboxes on the road that should be removed yearly roadworthies will only be widely accepted if they remove the cost aspect and make it about safety and not about money.
D
Dave
Guest
If they make it free you'll see more false claims of stuff needing replacing.
Why, because the mechanics want to make some money.
There needs to be some incentive to look over the vehicles.
Remove licences from those who dont do the inspections properly.
As for the speed limit. Roads that use to be sign posted as 100km/h zone in the 90's are now often 80km/h zones.
Look at how far car's have come since the 1990's.
Why, because the mechanics want to make some money.
There needs to be some incentive to look over the vehicles.
Remove licences from those who dont do the inspections properly.
As for the speed limit. Roads that use to be sign posted as 100km/h zone in the 90's are now often 80km/h zones.
Look at how far car's have come since the 1990's.
K
KraftyPg
Guest
It's a catch 22, make it free and mechanics won't do the job but people wont feel ripped off. Make it a cost and mechanics will still rip off the system and people will feel ripped off. I maintain my car, I look after it, there might one day be a crack in the window which would make it unroadworthy but that doesn't mean I need it replaced or that the car is unsafe. Yearly roadworthies might have some place but the system can never be perfect therefore should be removed.
So speed limits should be raised because cars a better. What about driving standards and the ****wit percentile that can't drive safely at the current limit. Cars might be safer, roads might be better built but until ****wits can be trained better there is very little argument for higher speeds based on how good our roads might be.
So speed limits should be raised because cars a better. What about driving standards and the ****wit percentile that can't drive safely at the current limit. Cars might be safer, roads might be better built but until ****wits can be trained better there is very little argument for higher speeds based on how good our roads might be.
