So far the this new Nav sounds awesome and this is being backed up by the few that have driven it. Will be interesting to see if it develops any issues that have plagued the 2.5TD such as completely fabricated fuel figures, timing chain failures, intermitent turbo failures, etc. Will also be interesting to see how the auto holds up to the torque as I noticed these motors are punching out the same torque as a brand new Commo SS V8!!
This V6 engine has been running around in Renault cars for about 18 months now and I have not been able to find any bad news about them. I am not for a moment suggesting there is none, it's just I have not found any so far.
Doug
The fuel label on the front windscreen indicated 9 point something. I can't recall exactly but I think is was 9.4 or there abouts. The label on my Nav when I bought it was 10 point something. So if they are using the same formula as they did in 2008 to determing the fuel economy it would appear that the V6 has a better fuel economy that the 2.5D. I guess time will confirm or refute that.
What annoys me, is that the big city dealers seem to get preference, and the poor bush blokes have to wait until there is some surplus.
In regard to VW, there has been no BS. They have said all along, that the Amarok will be available in March...and it looks like they will be. The reviews on the Amarok are very good, with most saying that it is a big step foward from anything that is out there now. I'm just a bit worried about the 120kw 2 litre twin turbo engine. 120kw is a lot short of 170kw.
Enter your email address to join: