Ok... back on track. Thanks Lads for some entertainment!
Wow!! all that for a response to whether you will get better flex with sway bars connected or disconnected...........
I wasnt bagging your warranty, R&D methods, time it takes to get things right before you release a product, the knowledge of your team, if you are the only ones to offer what you do, ect ect ect or any of the other things you mentioned in above post.
Does my background really matter??
after all weren't you an accountant?? or are an accountant??
Does over 25yrs of being involved with 4x4's count and over 25yrs of driving and owning all sorts of off road toys count??
At the end of the day no i dont have a business selling suspension, but this goes to show i have no axe to grind and have absolutely nothing to gain from telling it how i see it.
I wish you all the success in the world Mat, you seem to have a great business plan and you can definitely promote your gear very well (gift of the gab)
As i said i have nothing to gain by saying that 4x4's are better off with the sway bars disconnected WHEN OFF ROAD, simply due to the front being able to work independently without fighting against the sway bar.
I will get some pics this weekend while im away with and with out the sway bar, then tell me that it makes no difference.
Not being smart in any way, Can you also explain for me how using your struts can give you 4" of lift while not loosing down travel, without changing the upper or lower control arms??
Does the UCA not have a limited amount of travel, that even with no strut in at all the UCA only has a set amount of movement before it hits the coil bucket?? (due to its design ??)
Nathan,
I'm no accountant. My Mrs is, so is my sister... but not me.
I don't party hard enough to be an accountant.
As i said i have nothing to gain by saying that 4x4's are better off with the sway bars disconnected WHEN OFF ROAD, simply due to the front being able to work independently without fighting against the sway bar.
I will get some pics this weekend while im away with and with out the sway bar, then tell me that it makes no difference.
I didn't say it makes no difference, well not to my recollection... after a quick re-read of previous posts this is what I said in post 174:
The Swaybar isn't a huge issue, it has it's limitations, but it plays it's part in a stable IFS and disconnects aren't in our immediate R&D plans.
Yes the swaybar limits the front suspension travel and flex, but it's a OEM part and plays a role in the front suspension geometry... so we will work with it.
Swaybar disconnects can be great, but can also cause issues... when disconnected the lose ends can snag and damage CV boots and get caught on sticks and other obstacles offroad and cause more damage... so there is a lot to consider when deciding whether to disconnect them or leave them intact and work with them.
Shall we just agree to disagree... ?
We may well decide in time to make a disconnect option... All I'm saying is that they play a role in a IFS set up and at this stage we are working with them.
Not being smart in any way, Can you also explain for me how using your struts can give you 4" of lift while not loosing down travel, without changing the upper or lower control arms??
Ummm... well where do I start.
Firstly our innovation and ability to get more lift without compromising down travel, or increasing it is our intellectual property and part of our outside the box thinking in terms of coilover set up, design and fabrication. I'm not going to sit on a public forum and explain the inner workings of our gear for the world to see.
Shock open and closed length, coil length and binding point, piston position, oil capacity, internal bumpstops and a stack of other variables all go into coilover design and function... if you are under the assumption that all coilovers are built the same way then fair enough... I'm not here to run a building shocks 101 class either.
We achieve more lift and down travel because we work real hard to develop our own shocks and coilovers. Our own stuff built to our specs.
Our coilovers allow up to 4" of lift.
Yes you need other parts to get the 4" of lift to work... but guys can buy them now, run them up to 3" for the moment and then later add a UCA and perhaps a LCA and use 4" of lift if they want.
That is what we offer, and none of our customers have been under any false pretenses that we offer 4" of lift with no other parts to make it happen.
We have proven with the Hilux set up that we can offer up to 4" of lift and still maintain 4" of down travel from our Rekon set up... something unheard of 2 years ago and most said it couldn't be done.
Obviously the Hilux set up is markedly different to that on the Navara, and I'm not saying we will achieve the same stats with the Navara... rather just saying there is more than one way to skin a cat.
At the end of the day most blokes seem to be after a 3" lift for their Navara... maybe a 4" lift for a few blokes.
Basically most guys who have contacted us want to fit 33" tyres comfortably, and they want the ability to dial in the exact amount of lift they use up front... not be stuck with a static lift that sags over time and have no easy options to adjust this.
We know we can offer this 3" lift now, and 4" in time... it's just a case of finishing the testing and development and then releasing the products once they are ready.
Not sure if we will satisfy your needs for hard facts on the forum with images and the like... We could go back and forth for post after post and get nowhere.
I think the "proof" will come in time with customer feedback and real life trip write ups and videos etc.
All in good time, the Navara has some untapped flex and 4WD potential and I think this Rekon set up we are working on will surprise a few people when it is complete.
Cheers,
Matt