Disrespect all you like, I take no offence.But it surprises me that you'd prefer the Pajero off road to a Navara. We have one of each & I'd take the D22 over the Pajero almost every time when out in the sticks. Maybe it's because you have a D40? (no disrespect meant)
I should probably have mentioned that it's the older chassis Pajeros that I like. I reckon there's no place for monocoque off-road. Another big plus for the Pajeros is their LSD, which is the best I've ever come across, provided they're filled with the correct oil. I can't count the number of times others have become stuck in places where I can drive a Pajero with one wheel in the air. Like most makes and models, there's a knack to getting the best out of them. Regardless of whether it's myself or the wife driving, we've taken our Pajeros places where the gung-ho boys in their Cruisers and Patrols have backed away and taken the chicken track and that's without ever even having diff locks. One notable exception was where one bloke in his tricked out Cruiser thought that anywhere we could go he'd go easily. He was a bit shattered after rolling off the rocks we'd just casually driven over.I've managed to work out how to get the monocoque on the Pajero to ride the bumps without shaking the dash out onto our laps on heavily corrugated dirt roads.
I'm well aware of and very proficient in the technique but not all limited slip diffs are of equal quality.^ If you still have a limited slip diff in your D40, try applying some handbrake when lifting one of the rear wheels. This will reduce spin in the lifted wheel.
In addition to reduced ramp-over it also was a particularly poor approach angle, which admittedly is a pretty common trait of utes of that size. The poor turning circle can only partially be blamed on the wheelbase. Poor engineering must be held accountable for the worst of it. There are longer vehicles on the road with better turning circles. Quite simply, it not only could be much better, it should be much better.The D40 does have another issue not listed above - reduced rampover. It's a consequence of the long wheelbase (which is also the reason for the poor turning circle).
If you must have sidesteps on an off-road vehicle then they need to take the form of rock sliders. Pajero owners destroy their fair share of sidesteps as well.For those that don't know what that means, it's the clearance available going over a mound where the front wheels come down on the far side but the rear haven't yet come up the rise. Longer wheelbases can get caught on larger mounds than shorter wheelbase vehicles. I ripped the side steps off mine trying to go over a mound at the 2013 Muster in Qld.
True enough but I'll argue that in standard form a Navara won't go where I can take a stock Pajero.Standard springs in any of these utes are going to be questionable for serious off-roading.
I'm surprised that yours lifted so much. I've just installed heavy duty springs to suit a constant 250 kg load on the rear of my Navara which should result in only a 35mm lift. I'll confirm that when I do the front end but that is postponed for now on account of breaking a finger while doing the rear. I really shouldn't do these jobs without having had a good sleep beforehand.They tend to supply flat springs because you get a softer, more car-like ride, but these can easily invert (and do, mine did fairly quickly). The trouble is, buying springs that won't invert induces a considerable lift (mine rose 85mm in the rear) which raises legality questions. On that score, I haven't been stopped once and queried about my lift, which might be partly because it's not that extreme, and partly because I don't drive like I want attention from the law.
I'm surprised that yours lifted so much. I've just installed heavy duty springs to suit a constant 250 kg load on the rear of my Navara which should result in only a 35mm lift.
I no longer partake of alcohol but I'm very active in the getting old category.I chose the ARB Dakar "dual rate" springs, for varying loads up to 300kg. Might be 400kg. Was a few years ago now, some of the old grey matter has lost its integrity. Not sure if it's caused by beer or age, but I'll continue to do both.
Disrespect all you like, I take no offence.
I should probably have mentioned that it's the older chassis Pajeros that I like. I reckon there's no place for monocoque off-road (they work OK when you work out how to use them) Another big plus for the Pajeros is their LSD, which is the best I've ever come across, provided they're filled with the correct oil. I can't count the number of times others have become stuck in places where I can drive a Pajero with one wheel in the air. Like most makes and models, there's a knack to getting the best out of them (There is no LSD in our Pajero, it has traction control). Regardless of whether it's myself or the wife driving, we've taken our Pajeros places where the gung-ho boys in their Cruisers and Patrols have backed away and taken the chicken track and that's without ever even having diff locks. One notable exception was where one bloke in his tricked out Cruiser thought that anywhere we could go he'd go easily. He was a bit shattered after rolling off the rocks we'd just casually driven over.
Problems I've noticed with my Navara include it being too long for proper off-road use and (standard) suspension that really doesn't work as well as it should to keep the wheels on the ground. Its articulation isn't much better than that of a Pajero but due to the extra length it's even less effective and it doesn't drive at all well on three wheels. I know there's a lot you can do to a Navara to make it a better off-roader but the same applies to the Pajero (and just about everything else out there). The only even remotely valid comparison is between stock models.
Enter your email address to join: