In Europe they have had the DPF and cat all-in-one for some time and right up the dump pipe near the turbo and still have problems with them blocking up.
Will have to see how they go.
I do mostly HYW driving so should not be a problem for me. (fingers crossed)
I wouldn't think that a reasonably driven car would have any trouble with the DPF. Mine's just gone past its 200,000km and the DPF is still there, still doing its thing.
I suppose part of the difference is that I'm constantly conscious of how I'm driving and what I'm asking the engine to do. I've been 4WDing and spent some considerable time in 4LO, and rather than let the car choke up, I've sat in second (still in 4LO) and held the revs at around 1800-2000 for an extended period as we came up the trails towards the main roads.
That's not going to be the case for everyone and for everyone to be happy with the way the DPF works, it has to work for the way everyone drives - and obviously it doesn't, or more D40 autos would still have their DPFs intact.
I hope that moving the DPF into the CAT makes it more reliable for more driving styles.
Think the biggest problem is the ones that go to the shops and pickup the kids and don't get hot and run long enough. Soccer mums car!!!!.
A diesel needs to be worked.
My old 2003 jeep with the merc 5cyl got better economy on a long run with a trailer (6x4 van body) on then without the trailer.
Enter your email address to join: