DieselTuner2
Member
...
Last edited:
3" is generally better. however there may be a reason this particular engine is dropping low down power. quiet possibly the ecu is detecting to much boost early on and is reducing fuel or its having trouble controlling turbo.
it could be something thats fixable, or use smaller exhaust to get around the problem.
what doesn't help is some of the early variable turbo engines had poor control systems. when you fitted a big exhaust the turbo overboosted causing problems. so exhaust crowds will not fit big exhausts to them. hence the "smaller is better" line is born.
yeah all that is from atmo engines which can be true when dealing with the tuning section of the exhaust. however downstream of the tuned section it can't be to big.Actually the "Smaller is better" bit has been going around for a lot longer than VNT turbos, it has been kicking around for cars since 4.1L Falcons had exhausts that would be better suited to a 120Y.
Dave said:Well done on the testing.
But dont bag out the competition.
Well you keep the customers happy and word gets around. The business keeps flowing.
Agree with Dave. Bagging out the competition won't make me buy a products. Showing me how a product is better then another ( which you have ) will make me buy it.
Leprechaun, Chipit, Anyone?
Where are the comments on the graphs, and responses to them?
Everyone is quick to play the slam down game, until results are actually posted for once.
And then what? No response, just like I anticipated.
Enter your email address to join: