YBOD
Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2012
- Messages
- 389
- Reaction score
- 2
On the way back from a recent trip the wife and I were discussing what constituted a "serious offroader", an off reader and a soft roarer (yeah I know, not the normal husband/wife debates but what can I say, she's that type of girl).
Anyway, in the good old days it was easy; a patrol, defender or Cruiser as an off reader, if they were modified and bo tailed for rock crawling they were serious off reader and anything else (Rav 4, xtrail or freelander) was a softroader. It could have been an engine size/power thing (although that would rule out all Landies) or perhaps solid axles and solid chasis vs IFS and monocoque. I'm not quite sure.
However, with the ever increasing range of softer softer roaders as well as plenty of contenders in the "perfectly capable" but perhaps not "serious" off reader category such as our own beloved Navara its not so clear cut.
So, thought I'd so throw it out there: what separates an off reader from a softroader nowadays in your opinion?
Anyway, in the good old days it was easy; a patrol, defender or Cruiser as an off reader, if they were modified and bo tailed for rock crawling they were serious off reader and anything else (Rav 4, xtrail or freelander) was a softroader. It could have been an engine size/power thing (although that would rule out all Landies) or perhaps solid axles and solid chasis vs IFS and monocoque. I'm not quite sure.
However, with the ever increasing range of softer softer roaders as well as plenty of contenders in the "perfectly capable" but perhaps not "serious" off reader category such as our own beloved Navara its not so clear cut.
So, thought I'd so throw it out there: what separates an off reader from a softroader nowadays in your opinion?