S Stevod40 Member Joined Jun 12, 2015 Messages 15 Reaction score 0 Location Sydney Jun 13, 2015 #1 What's better 2007 with 140k km 08 with 150 k 2010 with 160k My second car so only gets used couple of times a week and holidays.
What's better 2007 with 140k km 08 with 150 k 2010 with 160k My second car so only gets used couple of times a week and holidays.
S Stevod40 Member Joined Jun 12, 2015 Messages 15 Reaction score 0 Location Sydney Jun 13, 2015 #2 All are around same price
Old.Tony Administrator Administrator Joined Oct 3, 2009 Messages 18,165 Reaction score 853 Location Mid Coast Region, NSW, Australia Jun 13, 2015 #3 The 2010 model is likely to have a good timing chain. The others might have weaker chains. Chains were upgraded in Jan 2010. 140-160K is nothing. You'd do that in one lap.
The 2010 model is likely to have a good timing chain. The others might have weaker chains. Chains were upgraded in Jan 2010. 140-160K is nothing. You'd do that in one lap.
S Stevod40 Member Joined Jun 12, 2015 Messages 15 Reaction score 0 Location Sydney Jun 13, 2015 #4 Ok thanks good to know
V Vigilante Member Joined Dec 25, 2012 Messages 247 Reaction score 0 Location SE Melb Burbs Jun 13, 2015 #5 If you could stretch to a 2011+ that would be a safer bet (just to be on the safe side) due to the chain issue Tony eluded to.
If you could stretch to a 2011+ that would be a safer bet (just to be on the safe side) due to the chain issue Tony eluded to.
S Stevod40 Member Joined Jun 12, 2015 Messages 15 Reaction score 0 Location Sydney Jun 13, 2015 #6 The problem is I didn't want to spend more than 20k and there is only one 2010 model on carsales nothing newer. And has to be auto for the missus to drive.
The problem is I didn't want to spend more than 20k and there is only one 2010 model on carsales nothing newer. And has to be auto for the missus to drive.