You are legally allowed to do the servicing as the owner, you do not need a stamp. The fight will be just as hard with a non dealer stamp as an owner signature. And the fight will always depend on so many varying factors it's barely worth considering.
It depends who you believe. Some will say you need dealershit servicing to have no issues with warranty but they can deny a claim on a dealershit serviced vehicle as quickly as they can a non dealershit serviced vehicle. If you know how to service it and do it exactly by the book the stamp does not make it any easier or hard to claim warranty.
There is no way I would like to be caught up inappropriately using a stamp for warranty purposes. Doing so would be fraudulent.
I would be mighty pissed off if I bought a car with "full service history" only to discover it had been completed by the owner.
It is not that the owner may necessarily be less capable of performing the service but they should not be certifying that someone else has done the work.
Using a stamp by someone who didn't do the service may well be fraudulent but even making up your own stamp that say Fred Nerk Owner is totally legal and not grounds for refusal of warranty.
However just how many people have purchased a second hand car and seen a 'dealer' stamp in the book and just assumed that it's been serviced by a dealer rather than ringing said dealer and confirming that the car has in fact been in the shop on each date suggested?
People assume way too much and the number of people who are seduced by a stamp in a book is ridiculous. Many of these same people suggest that a collection of stamps is enough to convince them the car has a service history. Even dealers falsify service books when it suits them, right wrong or otherwise it takes more than looking in a book and seeing a 'dealer stamp' to ensure there is a service history.
Enter your email address to join: