That makes sense to me (which could be a worry lol).
In fairness I've heard this claim from people who sell such aftermarket stuff. Have seen it recommended for cars that are chipped to lower egt's.
The fuel economy claim could be just manufacturer marketing spin also. At least I know the 3 litre Hilux has a reasonable intercooler but uses more fuel than the Nav. Goes a lot better too though (on the highway).
The other thing with top mounted intercoolers is they will offer some cooling on the highway, but punching over 1,100 or so sand hills across the Simpson in 40+ deg, they'll probably do the opposite and be a heat soak. So a front mount would be better.
Seems a lot of trouble to go to though when they work fine as is, and more stuff that can break. Each to their own though.
In fairness I've heard this claim from people who sell such aftermarket stuff. Have seen it recommended for cars that are chipped to lower egt's.
The fuel economy claim could be just manufacturer marketing spin also. At least I know the 3 litre Hilux has a reasonable intercooler but uses more fuel than the Nav. Goes a lot better too though (on the highway).
The other thing with top mounted intercoolers is they will offer some cooling on the highway, but punching over 1,100 or so sand hills across the Simpson in 40+ deg, they'll probably do the opposite and be a heat soak. So a front mount would be better.
Seems a lot of trouble to go to though when they work fine as is, and more stuff that can break. Each to their own though.